Search for: All records

Abstract Previous geophysical studies in the New England Appalachians identified a ∼15 km offset in crustal thickness near the surface boundary between Laurentia and the accreted terranes. Here, we investigate crustal structure using data from a denser array: New England Seismic Transects experiment, which deployed stations spaced ∼10 km apart across the Laurentia‐Moretown terrane suture in northwestern Massachusetts. We used receiver function (RF) analysis to detectPtoSVconverted waves and identified multiple interfaces beneath the transect. We also implemented a harmonic decomposition analysis to identify features at or near the Moho with dipping and/or anisotropic character. Beneath the Laurentian margin, the Ps converted phase from the Moho arrives almost 5.5 s after the initialPwave, whereas beneath the Appalachian terranes, the pulse arrives at 3.5 s, corresponding to ∼48 and ∼31 km depth, respectively. The character of the RF traces beneath stations in the middle of our array suggests a complex transitional zone with dipping and/or anisotropic boundaries extending at least ∼30 km. This extension is measured in our profiles and perpendicular to the suture. We propose one possible crustal geometry model that is consistent with our observations and results from previous studies. 

Constraints on the thickness, transitional boundaries, and composition of Earth's crust are pivotal in studying its formation and evolution. We use data from 132 seismic installations throughout the northeastern US to explore how tectonic events, such as orogenesis and rifting, have altered the crust of the northeastern US and southeastern Canada, and to distinguish between Laurentia and the Appalachian terranes. We include data from seismic installations from the NEST and SEISConn experiments, spanning the Laurentia–Appalachian boundary, and present estimates of crustal thickness,V_p/V_s, and thickness of the transition between crustal and mantle rocks using Ps receiver functions. We find some first-order differences between Laurentia and Appalachian terranes, with Laurentia exhibiting thicker crust (c.39 v.c.33 km) and a broader crust–mantle transition thickness (c.3 v. <1.5 km). AverageV_p/V_svalues are similar between Laurentia (c.1.77) and Appalachian terranes (c.1.74); however, we identify anomalousV_p/V_sin a few regions, including highV_p/V_saround the Adirondack Mountains and lowV_p/V_sin southern New England. The southern New England region is also anomalous in terms of its systematically thinner crust and sharper crust–mantle transition, which may be a consequence of the formation and collapse of the Acadian altiplano during the mid-to-late Paleozoic. 

Abstract Seismic anisotropy beneath eastern North America, as expressed in shear wave splitting observations, has been attributed to plate motion‐parallel shear in the asthenosphere, resulting in fast axes aligned with the plate motion. However, deviations of fast axes from plate motion directions are observed near major tectonic boundaries of the Appalachians, indicating contributions from lithospheric anisotropy associated with past tectonic processes. In this study, we conduct anisotropic receiver function (RF) analysis using data from a dense seismic array traversing the New England Appalachians in Connecticut to examine anisotropic layers in the crust and upper mantle and correlate them with past tectonic processes as well as present‐day mantle flow. We use the harmonic decomposition method to separate directionally‐dependent variations of RFs and focus on features with the same harmonic signals observed across multiple stations. Within the crust, there are multiple features that may be correlated with stratification in the Hartford Basin, faults in the Taconic thrust belt, shear zones formed during Salinic/Acadian terrane accretion events, and orogen‐parallel crustal flow in the Acadian orogenic plateau. We apply a Bayesian inversion method to obtain quantitative constraints on the direction and strength of intra‐crustal anisotropy beneath the Hartford Basin. In the upper mantle, we identify a fossil shear zone possibly formed during oblique subduction of Rheic Ocean lithosphere. We also find evidence for a plate motion‐parallel flow zone in the asthenosphere that is likely disturbed by mantle upwelling near the southern margin of the Northern Appalachian Anomaly in the eastern part of the study area. 

Abstract Seismic tomography observations show a low‐velocity feature in the upper mantle beneath eastern North America known as the Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA). Proposed models for the formation of the NAA include a remnant high‐temperature feature resulting from the passage of the Great Meteor Hotspot, edge‐driven convection, and ongoing asthenospheric upwelling. We investigate the structure of the lithosphere above the central portion of the NAA using data from the New England Seismic Transects (NEST) experiment. Ps receiver functions reveal two consistent interfaces beneath the dense northern line of NEST: the Moho (the base of the crust) and a deeper negative velocity gradient (NVG) feature located at depths between 60 and 110 km. We consider several potential explanations for this NVG feature; based on comparisons with previous results, we propose that it likely corresponds to the lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary. Our results indicate that the lithosphere beneath New England is nonuniform and has likely been thinned. 

The New England Appalachians provide a fascinating window into a host of fundamental geological problems. These include the modification of crustal and mantle lithospheric structure via orogenesis, terrane accretion, and continental rifting, the evolution of individual terranes through processes such as channel flow and ductile extrusion, and the causes and consequences of the Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA), a prominent geophysical anomaly in the upper mantle. Recent and ongoing deployments of dense seismic arrays in New England are providing images of the crust and upper mantle in unprecedented detail, allowing us to address both new and longstanding science questions. These deployments include the Seismic Experiment for Imaging Structure beneath Connecticut (SEISConn, 2015-2019), the New England Seismic Transects (NEST, 2018-present), and the GEology of New England via Seismic Imaging Studies (GENESIS, 2022-present) arrays. Here we present results from these experiments that are shedding new light on the tectonic evolution of New England and the ways in which structures and processes in the upper mantle can affect the structure of the overlying lithosphere. These include detailed new images of crustal architecture beneath central and southern New England, including a sharp transition from thick (~48 km) crust Laurentia terranes to thin (~32 km) crust beneath Appalachian terranes. The character of this offset beneath the SEISConn and NEST arrays suggests an overlap of two Moho boundaries, forming an overthrust-type structure that may have resulted from reactivation of faults during the compression and shortening associated with the formation of the hypothesized Acadian Altiplano. Beneath SEISConn, there is evidence for multiple relict structures preserved in the lithosphere from past episodes of terrane accretion and suturing, as well as anisotropic layering that constrains the kinematics of past lithospheric deformation events. Beneath the NEST line in central New England, we infer a relatively shallow (~80 km) lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary above the NAA upper mantle geophysical anomaly, providing evidence for lithospheric thinning above a presumed asthenospheric upwelling. Finally, preliminary results suggest layered crustal anisotropy beneath the GENESIS array, perhaps corresponding to a past episode of channel flow in the mid-crust. 

Abstract Along‐strike variation of the Laurentian rifted margin and the Appalachian orogen has long been recognized in the geologic record. We investigated the manifestation of this along‐strike variation at depth by generating scattered wavefield migration profiles from four dense seismic arrays deployed across the Appalachian orogen at different latitudes. All profiles exhibit a similar crustal thickness decrease of 15–20 km from the Mesoproterozoic Grenville Province to the Paleozoic Appalachian accreted terranes, but the Moho architecture differs dramatically along strike. The profiles beneath the central and southern Appalachians show a smoothly varying Moho geometry; in contrast, there is an abrupt Moho depth offset beneath the New England Appalachians. This contrast in Moho geometry may result from variations in the Laurentian rifted margin architecture, changes in Taconic orogeny subduction polarity, and greater crustal shortening during the Acadian‐Neoacadian orogeny in southern New England and the Alleghanian orogeny in the central and southern Appalachians. A first‐order along‐strike transition in the behavior of Appalachian orogenic processes is located between the central and New England Appalachians.